Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Bierwirth v. AII Acquisition Corporation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Defendant:
Alan MRO Supply Inc., Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. doing business as Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. formerly known as Statewide Industrial Equipment Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor by Merger to Sager-Spuck Supply Co., Inc., BW/IP International Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bierwirth and Gloria Bierwirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Schwartz et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 8:2020cv01507
Cross Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber CO., Rockwell Automation, Inc., Raytheon Aircraft Co. and others
Respondent:
Honeywell International, Inc., Goodrich Corporation, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Gregory Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schwartz et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2020cv08861
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Meggit Aircraft Braking Systems, Inc., CBS Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
George Schwartz, Theresa Schwartz and Gregory Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stecher et al v. Aerco International, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08029
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Cleaver-Brooks Company, Inc., Union Carbide and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stecher and Dianne Stecher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Keating, Jr. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv12258
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC, Gardner Denver, Inc., Industry Products Co. and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS J. KEATING and Francis J. Keating, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Mather v. Ingersoll-Rand Company et al
as 3:2017cv01491
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mather
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Co. , Aurora Pump , Bayer Cropscience Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Aurora Pump , Nash Engineering Co , Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Ernest Mather , Nash Engineering Co , Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01138
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc , Aurora Pump Co , Carrier Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
James Alfred Stevens and Doreatha Stevens
Cross_claimant:
Alfa Laval Inc , Velan Valve Corp , Aurora Pump Co and others
Cross_defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc , Aurora Pump Co , Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stevens et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01101
Plaintiff:
James Alfred Stevens and Doreatha Stevens
Defendant:
General Electric Company , CBS Corporation and Foster Wheeler, LLC
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company and General Dynamics Corporation
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , CBS Corporation and Foster Wheeler, LLC
Consol_cross_claimant:
Alfa Laval Inc and Aurora Pump Co
Consol_cross_defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc , Aurora Pump Co , Carrier Corporation and others
Consol_defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc , Aurora Pump Co , Carrier Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Daniels v. General Electric Co et al
as 3:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Synovia Daniels
Defendant:
General Electric Co, Bayer Cropscience Inc , CBS Corporation and others
Pecial_master:
James Hawkins
Cross_claimant:
Foster Wheeler L.L.C. , IMO Industries, Inc. , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Foster Wheeler L.L.C. , Bayer Cropscience Inc, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deane v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09136
Plaintiff:
Sydney P. Deane and Nancy A. Deane
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carrier Corporation and Eaton Corporation, as successor in interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
