Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International Trade Investigations or Negotiations
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Sierra Pacific Industries, Carrier Forest Products Ltd., Carrier Lumber Ltd. and others
Government of Canada et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Government of Canada, Government of Alberta, Government of Quebec and others
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Canfor Corporation, Canadian Forest Products, Ltd., Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd. and others
Government of Quebec v. US
as 22-1807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC, MARMEN INC., MARMEN ENERGIE INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION and THE GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO
Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber v. US
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS OR NEGOTIATIONS and FONTAINE INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, MARCEL LAUZON INC., LES PRODUITS FORESTIERS D&G LTEE and others
Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber v. US
as 22-1068
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS OR NEGOTIATIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FONTAINE INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, MARCEL LAUZON INC. and others
Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc. v. US
as 22-1021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOBILIER RUSTIQUE (BEAUCE) INC.
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA and GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS OR NEGOTIATIONS
LISENKO v. GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC
as 1:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE LISENKO
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC, SUPERIOR COURT OF QUEBEC, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
