Cases 41 - 50 of 60
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT, INC. v. HELP INDIANA VETS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01857
Defendant:
DEAN M. GRAHAM and HELP INDIANA VETS, INC.
Plaintiff:
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. NELSON et al
as 1:2013cv01800
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
GRAHAM NELSON and ZOJA PTY LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Graham J. Hooper v. Christine R. Kelley et al
as 8:2013cv00165
Defendant:
DOES and Christine R Kelley
Plaintiff:
Graham J Hooper
CK Franchising Inc v. Comfort Keepers Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
CK Franchising Inc
Defendant:
Comfort Keepers Inc and Catherine Graham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
D.R. Meyers Distributing Co., Inc. v. Professional Server Certification Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv01885
Plaintiff:
D.R. Meyers Distributing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Professional Server Certification Corporation, Be Online, Inc. and Robert Graham
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
B.B. Graham and Co. Inc. v. Know Your Options Inc et al
as 8:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
B.B. Graham and Co. Inc.
Defendant:
BrokersXpress LLC, Does, Know Your Options Inc and others
Solid 21, Inc. v. Graham-London et al
as 2:2011cv00467
Defendant:
Does and Graham-London
Plaintiff:
Solid 21, Inc.
SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN, ROBERT KODRITCH, MAC DADDY'S IRISH PUB INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Solid 21, Inc. v. LVMH et al
as 2:2010cv07079
Defendant:
Breitling SA, Bulgari, Chopard and others
Plaintiff:
Solid 21, Inc.
Steadigrow Inc et al v. Michael Emanuel et al
as 8:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
Graham Clifford, Agnes Hamilton, Elizabeth Hamilton and others
Defendant:
DOES, Element 6 Products LLC and Michael Emanuel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
