Cases 51 - 60 of 606
Graham v. USA
as 1:2019cv00039
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Graham v. Tynon
as 9:2018cv01489
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham and Johnathan Graham
Respondent:
T. Tynon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond v. Mitchell et al
as 9:2018cv01467
Defendant:
"Bob" O'Hora, Thomas Phillips, "John" Bauersfeld and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2018cv07183
Defendant:
Correction Officer and Superintendent Harold Graham
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Graham
as 6:2018cv06840
Respondent:
Superintendent Harold Graham
Petitioner:
Henry Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2018cv01312
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Harold Graham, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Ridge et al
as 1:2018cv09493
Defendant:
Mr. Peter T. Ridge, Mr. Micheal T. Ridge, Tamiko Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Carlington Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Graham v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv08906
Defendant:
Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, C.O. John/Jane Does #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Cindra Cameron-Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv08889
Defendant:
The Chief Administrator, Arresting Officer 887282, Arresting Officer 674007 and others
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Every v. Graham
as 9:2018cv01126
Respondent:
Harold Graham
Petitioner:
Douglas Every
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
