Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Graham v. Moore
as 4:2013cv00084
Petitioner:
Terrance Graham
Respondent:
James Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gaines v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Gaines
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Robert Graham, Douglas Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Gaines, Jr.
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Robert Graham, Douglas Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Hinds County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Felix Calvin Cunningham
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff's Dept., Hinds Co. District Attorney, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Graham et al
as 1:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
Senque Santanze Wright
Defendant:
Unknown Graham, Unknown Flower, David Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayborn v. Graham et al
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lavon Rayborn
Defendant:
Amber Graham, Johnnie Denmark, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairley v. Graham et al
as 4:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Stevenson L. Fairley
Defendant:
Unknown Graham, Unknown Dice, Unknown Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. GEO Group et al
as 4:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dexter Jerome Campbell
Defendant:
GEO Group, MDOC, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Windham et al
as 4:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Travis Dukes
Defendant:
Unknown Windham, Unknown Durant, G.E.O. Group, Inc. Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yergenson v. Phillips et al
as 2:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Harold LeMarr Yergenson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bobby Phillips, Melisa Lea, Rick Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
