Cases 21 - 30 of 209
Graham v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Respondent:
FNU Dobbs, Well Path Medical Corp. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Respondent:
FNU Dobbs, Well Path Medical Corp. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez Jr v. Sanchez
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez, Jr
Defendant:
Pamela Rae Graham Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Watts et al
as 2:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Janis Graham Jack, Sandra L Watts, Kristen D'Ann Langford and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent v. Gibson et al
as 9:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Anitra Lindley, Matthew Ruble, Robert J Posvar and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Vincent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poirier v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chipres v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
