Cases 11 - 20 of 37
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5575
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Graham v. John Gilley
as 22-5423
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
William Graham v. John Gilley
as 22-5412
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
William Graham v. P. Landon
as 22-5032
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
P. LANDON, Warden
Darrin LaPine v. Robert Savoie, et al
as 16-1893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SAVOIE, Sheriff, MICHAEL BITNAR, Undersheriff, JOHN HORKE, Tether Agent and others
Joseph Dunbar, et al v. Yvonne Rose, et al
as 15-2530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH GREGORY DUNBAR, BERNARD GOINES, JR., CARLOS WHITFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
YVONNE ROSE, Librarian, Individual and Official Capacity, M. SAGE, Classification Director, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MIchigan Department of Corrections and others
Jeremy Schuh v. Washtenaw County, et al
as 14-1655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY DANIEL SCHUH
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHTENAW COUNTY, RODNEY POLLARD, Probation Officer, PATRICK A. HUGHES, Probation Administrator and others
Donald Graham v. USA
as 13-6314
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD L. GRAHAM, aka Mark Wilcox
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony Graham v. Warden, Chillicothe Correction
as 11-4084
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
