Cases 1 - 10 of 790
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COTE v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02859
Petitioner:
RICHARD PAUL COTE
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan et al v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent:
Joseph Biden and David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Godbee v. Graham
as 2:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Burnett Godbee
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
James Martin Graham
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
