Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Atherton et al v. Lake Charles et al
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Atherton and Heather Webb Atherton
Defendant:
City of Lake Charles, Lake Charles Police Department, Mikah Janelle Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Stamos et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jill Hines and Jim Hoft
Defendant:
Alex Stamos, Renee Diresta, Stanford Internet Observatory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Coleman v. Graham
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brittney Coleman and **Sanctioned/Barred* Brittney Coleman
Defendant:
Aubrey Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
McGee v. Ball et al
as 5:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jaqualine Renee McGee
Defendant:
La'Asia Ball, Ja'Tavia L Graham, Laura Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Ball et al v. Book et al
as 2:2019cv01283
Defendant:
LaSalle Management Co and Pat Book
Plaintiff:
Ja'Tavia L Graham, Laura Jones and La'Asia Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball et al v. Book et al
as 6:2019cv01283
Plaintiff:
Joplin Graham, Ja'Tavia L. Graham, La'Asia Ball and others
Defendant:
Lasalle Management Company, Catahoula Correctional Center and Pat Book
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
