Cases 1 - 10 of 63
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN et al v. BIDEN
as 5:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Kirk Brogie, Ernest Draper and others
Respondent:
Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Graham v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, James Paul Lankford, Stephanie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Trustees et al
as 5:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Trustees, Oklahoma County Sheriff, Corporal FNU McKinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Lankford
as 5:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
James Paul Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Williams
as 5:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Misty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
