Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEMPHILL et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
MONICA HEMPHILL, MONICA HEMPHILL, MONICA HEMPHILL and others
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
WOODEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv01809
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L. WOODEN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION
as 1:2008mc00511
In Re:
BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified:
NICOLE F.J. HAMANN, ALVA Y. WALLER and STEPHEN CARPENTER
Plaintiff:
ALL PLAINTIFFS, LINDA BURKES, BOBBIE PACE and others
Defendant:
EDWARD T. SCHAFER, THOMAS J. VILSACK, LILLIE M. WINGARD and others
Interested Party:
HENRY BARRIS, MUHAMMAD ROBBALAA, KARLA K. BATES-ADAMS and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY K. CHESTNUT, JOHN BOYD, BLACK FARMERS AND AGRICULTURALISTS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE'S CENTER FOR CLASS ACTION FARINESS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BENNETT et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. BENNETT, JIMMIE CONYERS, KATIE CROSBY and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ADAMS et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv00919
Plaintiff:
LINDA ADAMS, WILLIE E. ADAMS, SHIRLEY ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DUCKETT et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01116
Plaintiff:
PAULA DUCKETT, CAROLYN SESSOMS and CONNIE SPRIGGS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CLIFFORD B. JANEY and PAMELA GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
