Cases 41 - 50 of 71
GRAHAM v. GUZMAN et al
as 2:2015cv05208
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
ANA GUZMAN, CYNTHIA PACE, BULGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE ESTATE OF WALTER L. GRAHAM et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv05004
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF WALTER L. GRAHAM and BEVERLY E. GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, ROBIN WIMBERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYER v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
WURLIN GRAHAM and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
REYNOLDS v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN , RUSSELL J. BONO , CHARLES DOUGLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOWERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06356
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLOWERS , JUDAH WILLIAMS , BRADY FLOYD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GRAHAM v. ROSENBLUM et al
as 2:2014cv03390
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID ROSENBLUM, SUSIE ROSENBLUM, D&F CLOTHING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02331
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
