Cases 1 - 5 of 5
GRAIN CRAFT, INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00506
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
GRAIN CRAFT, INC. and SOUTHEASTERN MILLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Grain Craft, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Plaintiff:
Grain Craft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Berkley Global Product Recall Management v. Berkley Assurance Company et al (JRG3)
as 1:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Berkley Global Product Recall Management and Berkley Assurance Company
Defendant:
Grain Craft Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert, et al v. Cereal Food Processors, et al
as 17-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORI GILBERT, as administrator of the Estate of Michael Gilbert, deceased, MARY GILBERT, heir of Michael Gilbert, by and through her mother and natural guardian Lori Gilbert, LORI GILBERT, individually, as heir of Michael Gilbert and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CEREAL FOOD PROCESSORS, INC., a Kansas corporation and GRAIN CRAFT, INC., a Georgia corporation
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS 1-20 and THYSSEN KRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
