Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kenneth Williams v. Michael Simon, et al
as 20-35550
Defendant:
JOHN KITZHABOR, ANDREW HALLMAN, MOHAMED AHMED, Prisoner and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, ODOC Health Serv. Mgr., FITZGERALD, C/O, RICK COURSEY, (EOCI) Supt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35405
Defendant / Appellee:
LELAND BEAMER, Dr., ROBERT WHITE, RN, TLC COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Williams v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Nicolas Arrendondo, Dr. Leland Beamer, RN J. Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reuther v. Fuzi et al
as 3:2013cv02123
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Daniel Dewsnup, Dr. Christopher P. DiGuilio and others
Plaintiff:
Scot Alan Reuther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Williams v. Aaron Sprague, et al
as 13-36000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SPRAGUE, Attorney, JUDY DOE, Oregon Dept of Corr Correctional Ombudsman, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General and others
Williams v. Hallman et al
as 2:2013cv00950
Defendant:
Prisoner Mohamed Ahmed, (EOCI) Asst. Supt. Bridgette Amsberry, BHS Counselor Anderson and others
OSP:
ODOC Health Serv. Mgr. Steve Shelton and Dr. John Vargo
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Premo et al
as 6:2012cv01461
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsberry, Jerry Becker, Michael Burcham and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Hale Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callaway v. Shelton et al
as 2:2011cv00885
Defendant:
26 unnamed persons, Rick Coursey, Christopher Deguilio and others
Plaintiff:
Monte Brad Callaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
