Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eric Sabatini v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv06571
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Greenlane Holdings, Inc., Aaron Locascio, Adam Schoenfeld and others
Callaghan v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05635
Defendant:
Richard Taney, Jeff Uttz, Greenlane Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lance K. Callaghan
Garreffa v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05512
Defendant:
Richard Taney, Jeff Uttz, Aaron Locasio and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Garreffa
Douglas Chabot, et al v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc., et al
as 21-10395
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM SCHOENFELD, ETHAN RUDIN, COWEN AND COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS HAMMOND, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and RANDALL MAYER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Interested Party:
DOUGLAS CHABOT and YEVGENY GONCHAROV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UL LLC v. 7111495 Canada Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05308
Defendant:
Warehouse Goods LLC, Greenlane Holdings, Inc., Greenlane Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UL LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Mayer v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv81411
Defendant:
Richard Taney, Jeff Uttz, Aaron Locasio and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Mayer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Hammond v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv81259
Defendant:
Richard Taney, Jeff Uttz, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Hammond
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Randall Mayer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Reid v. Greenlane Holdings, Inc.
as 9:2019cv80711
Defendant:
Greenlane Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
