Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gregory Scott Richardson v. IVAMS, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02008
Petitioner: Gregory Scott Richardson, IVAMS, Inc. and Clerk of the Riverside Superior Court
Defendant: Doe Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gregory Scott Richardson v. IVAMS, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv01991
Plaintiff: Gregory Scott Richardson
Defendant: IVAMS, Inc. and Doe Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07746
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01178
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gregory Richardson v. United States District Courts
as 5:2021cv01932
Plaintiff: Gregory Scott Richardson
Defendant: United States District Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fei Wang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2021cv08128
Plaintiff: Fei Wang
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Gregory A. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03676
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gregory Richardson v. W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00830
Defendant: Clerk of Superior Court and W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
Plaintiff: Gregory Scott Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03536
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?