Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jones and John Alan Jones
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc, Caterpillar Inc. and Gregory Poole Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gregory Poole Equipment Company v. International Fidelity Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00277
Plaintiff:
Gregory Poole Equipment Company
Defendant:
International Fidelity Insurance Company, Precision 2000, Inc., Patricia A. Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Gregory Poole Equipment Company v. JP Electric, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Gregory Poole Equipment Company
Defendant:
JP Electric, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Walbridge Aldinger Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gregory Poole Equipment Company v. Royal Tractor Company, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00867
Plaintiff:
Gregory Poole Equipment Company
Defendant:
Royal Tractor Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Poole Equipment Company v. ATS Logistics Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Gregory Poole Equipment Company
Defendant:
ATS Logistics Services, Inc. and East Coast Specialized Hauling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00174
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00533
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
IN RE: Construction Supervision Services, Inc.
as 5:2012mc00018
Appellee:
Thomas Concrete of Carolina, Inc. , The John R. McAdams Company, Incorporated , Water Works Supply, Inc. and others
Defendant:
HD Supply Waterworks, Limited Partnership
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.