Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Guzman v. Warden, FCI Greenville
as 1:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
Jessie Guzman, III
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Greenville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guzman v. John B. Connally Unit Head Warden et al
as 5:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Albert Guadalupe Guzman
Defendant:
FNU John B. Connally Unit Head Warden and John B. Connally Unit Food Service Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Guzman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guzman v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Albert Guadalupe Guzman
Defendant:
Kenny B Smith, Jesus E. Rojas Torres, Correction Officer FNU Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guzman v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Albert Guadalupe Guzman
Defendant:
Kenny B. Smith, Jesus E. Rojas Torres and Correction Officer FNU Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman v. Rivercenter Mall Security et al
as 5:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ernest Guzman
Defendant:
Rivercenter Mall Security and Bexar County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02528
Plaintiff:
Hurshell Wheeler
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Richard Bledsoe, Charlie Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
