Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Sand Bar Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Sand Bar Enterprises LLC doing business as Sand Bar, Valerie Elisa Sutter, Rick Lynn Gaddis and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Michael Gaddy v. Superior Court of California, et al
as 21-16856
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN, (Delano-McFarland), DAVID WOLF, Judicial District Judge and others
English v. Granite Construction Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv03116
Defendant:
Molly Campbell, David C Darnell, Jeffrey J Lyash and others
Plaintiff:
Beau English
Michael Gaddy v. C. Pfeiffer
as 19-17041
Respondent / Appellee:
C. PFEIFFER
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Michael Gaddy v. M. Townsend, et al
as 19-15786
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDOVAL, Chief Inmate Appeals Officer, M. TOWNSEND, Appeals Coordinator and M. VOONG, Chief Inmate Appeals Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Michael Gaddy v. C. Ducart, et al
as 19-15149
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HOTTINGER, Correctional Case Records Manager, D. BRADBURY, Warden, P. BADURA, Correctional Case Records Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Emily Capati Gaddi v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02185
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Does, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Capati Gaddi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Product Partners, LLC v. Amanda Gaddis et al
as 2:2009cv05966
Plaintiff:
Product Partners, LLC, Product Partners, LLC and Product Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Amanda Gaddis, Lynn Figueroa and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
