Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01827
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JORDAN et al v. STOKES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02205
Plaintiff: CONSUELO JORDAN and CAROLYN E. JORDAN
Defendant: SHEILA STOKES, ROBIN GANT, RAYMOND HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JORDAN v. GANT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01632
Plaintiff: CONSUELO JORDAN
Defendant: ROBIN GANT, DEMOND TIGGS, SHEILA STOKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAUDT v. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00636
Plaintiff: TED A. KLAUDT
Defendant: STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, M. MICHAEL ROUNDS, DENNIS DAUGAARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANT v. DOE et al
as 1:2012cv01716
Petitioner: OCTUAN GANT
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?