Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Tapestry Inc. et al v. The Gap Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02697
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach IP Holdings, LLC and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc. and Does 1-10, Inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Victoria Dillihunt et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
United States of America, Matthew Abram Groening, Society of Jesus Jesuit Order and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos v. The GAP, Inc.
as 3:2023cv04715
Plaintiff:
Efren Ramos
Defendant:
The GAP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
GIFTCASH INC. v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02146
Plaintiff:
GIFTCASH INC.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Banana Republic, LLC, Old Navy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Black v. The Gap, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Edward Black
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patagonia, Inc. v. The Gap, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07437
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Union Gap School District v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03734
Plaintiff:
Union Gap School District
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
