Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PELINI et al v. AMSLER et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Defendant: AG WEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, DONALD S. AMSLER, D.S.A. SMART FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PELINI and RICHARD A. PELINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00782
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. AM-GARD, INC.
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff: JONI MILLER
Defendant: AM-GARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AM-GARD, INC.
as 2:2013cv00927
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: AM-GARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
GARD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56593
Plaintiff: LARRY W. GARD
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARD v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34684
Plaintiff: CHARLES L GARD
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARD v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67613
Plaintiff: ROBERT GARD
Defendant: AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARD v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32173
Plaintiff: CHARLES L. GARD
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. VALDEZ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01504
Plaintiff: WILLIAM T. DAVIS
Defendant: VALDEZ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAURIE HULL-ENGLES, KATHERINE TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
GARD v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61870
Plaintiff: ROBERT GARD, ROBERT GARD, ROBERT GARD and others
Defendant: ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?