Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Spriestersbach v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2021cv00456
Plaintiff:
Joshua Spriestersbach
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, City and County of Honolulu, Officer Abraham K. Bruhn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv00474
Defendant:
John Doe Partnerships 1-5, Roe Governmental Agencies 1-5, Roe Non-Profit Corporations 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Teagle v. Aquazone, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00571
Defendant:
Devon K. Merrifield and Aquazone, LLC
Plaintiff:
Garrett E. Teagle
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Allied World Specialty Insurance Company v. Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific (The)
as 1:2019cv00491
Defendant:
Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific (The), Jason C. Chang, M.D., Timothy J. Roe, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Allied World Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00502
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guadnola et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
John-Anthony Guadnola and Zachary-Garrett Guadnola
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
