Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Evans v. Nelson et al
as 2:2019cv01210
Defendant:
Jose Olvera, Steve Boston, Michelle Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz Rico v. Cain et al
as 2:2019cv01211
Plaintiff:
Jose Omar Ortiz Rico
Defendant:
Garth Gulick, Victor Ishida, Brad Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Walker v. Colette Peters, et al
as 19-35485
Defendant / Appellee:
GARTH GULICK, M.D., (SRCI), MARK NOOTH, Acting Eastside Director Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), JOHN DOES, All, (ODOC/SRCI) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON LEE WALKER
Kenneth Williams v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35405
Defendant / Appellee:
LELAND BEAMER, Dr., ROBERT WHITE, RN, TLC COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Dye v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00559
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick and Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Cal Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uribe v. Gulick et al
as 2:2018cv01809
Plaintiff:
Justin Patrick Uribe
Defendant:
Dr. Brian Hemphill, Dr. Chris Digiulio, Monica Landeverde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oster v. Gulick et al
as 2:2018cv01509
Plaintiff:
Gary Oster
Defendant:
Dr. Bryon Hemphill, Garth Gulick, MD, Bryon Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Cain et al
as 2:2018cv00923
Defendant:
Brad Cain, Ashley Clements and Garth Gulick
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donohue v. Hughes et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
A. Clements, R.N., J. Dafoe, R.N., Garth Gulick, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Patrick Donohue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Jenkins v. Steve Shelton, et al
as 18-35314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ANTHONY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, Director of Health Service, Oregon Department of Corrections, AIMEE HUGHES, GARTH GULICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
