Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Porter et al v. Hamblin et al
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter, Joeval M Jones, Samuel Warzyn and others
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , David Burnett, James Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Walker v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 16-1704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY D. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY HAMBLIN, JAMES SCHWOCHERT, MARC CLEMENTS and others
Tony Walker v. Wisconsin Department of Correc, et al
as 16-1241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY D. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY HAMBLIN, CHARLES COLE and others
Jairo Ramos v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 15-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIRO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY HAMBLIN, MARION MORGAN, JEFFREY PUGH, Warden and others
Walker v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
Tony D Walker
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Gary Hamblin, Charles Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin, David v. G4S Secure Solutions USA et al
as 3:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
David D. Austin, II
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions USA, Shane L. Peterson, Shantel L. Belot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bub, Martin v. Swiekatowski et al
as 3:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
Martin R. Bub
Defendant:
Swiekatowski , John Doe, Carol Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell, Roy v. Kallas, Kevin et al
as 3:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Roy Mitchell
Defendant:
Edward F. Wall , Gary Hamblin, Kevin Kallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus West v. Gregory Grams, et al
as 14-3623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS WEST, also known as Mansa Lutalo Iyapo
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY GRAMS, MICHAEL MEISNER, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Hashim v. Hamblin et al
as 2:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
Akinbo JS Hashim
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Cathy A Jess, Larry L Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
