Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Graham v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00977
Plaintiff:
Derrick Graham
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00979
Plaintiff:
Mark Cedric Bass, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawthorne v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawthorne
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00902
Plaintiff:
Dwight Lamar Walker
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00824
Plaintiff:
Stanley D. Price
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Luther Strange and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lavinskey v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00595
Plaintiff:
Clifton A. Lavinskey
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayo v. Hetzel et al (Inmate 3)
as 1:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
Russell Donald Mayo
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holiday v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00556
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jerome Holiday
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holiday v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00529
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jerome Holiday
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bass v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
