Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Medina v. Hatch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2148
Petitioner - Appellant: DIMAS MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee: TIMOTHY HATCH, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Judd v. King
as 10-2139
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee: GARY K. KING
Kassabji v. Janecka, et al
as 10-2140
Petitioner - Appellant: MIKE KASSABJI
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES JANECKA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Grace Requires Understanding, Inc. v. Rogers et al
as 6:2010cv00525
Plaintiff: Grace Requires Understanding, Inc.
Defendant: Mikki Rogers, Alfredo Vigil, Kathryn Falls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Consumer Data Industry Association v. Gary K. King
as 1:2010cv00458
Defendant: Consumer Data Industry Association and Gary K King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00315
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00288
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hinzo v. Tapia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2043
Petitioner - Appellant: JASON P. HINZO
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGE TAPIA and GARY K. KING
Torres v. Tapia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2294
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH TORRES
Respondent - Appellee: GEORGE TAPIA and GARY K. KING, Attorney General of the State of new Mexico
Ellis v. Ulibarri, et al
as 09-2290
Petitioner - Appellant: GARLON P. ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee: ROBERT ULIBARRI, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?