Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Federal National Mortgage v. Gary Woodroffe
as 20-11660
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE, a.k.a Fannie Mae
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY LEE WOODROFFE
Gary Woodroffe v. Jon Waage, et al
as 20-11353
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and JON M. WAAGE, Trustee
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY LEE WOODROFFE
Federal National Mortgage v. Woodroffe et al
as 8:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage and Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Rhema Progressive Inc., Rhyma Progressive Inc. and Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Department of Revenue v. Gary Woodroffe
as 19-10998
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, on behalf of Lizabeth Lynn Lotsey
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY LEE WOODROFFE
Woodroffe v. Coffin et al
as 8:2018cv03023
Defendant:
Ann Coffin, Karen Rushing, Florida Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Woodroffe v. Florida Department of Financial Services et al
as 8:2018cv02872
Defendant:
Marc Stemle, Florida Department of Financial Services, Ann Coffin and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Department of Revenue v. Woodroffe
as 8:2018cv02621
Plaintiff:
Department of Revenue
Defendant:
Gary L. Woodoroffe and Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gary Woodroffe v. JP Morgan Chase, et al
as 18-13197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01809
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Woodroffe et al v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 8:2018cv01614
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage and JP Morgan Chase
Plaintiff:
Rhema Progressive Inc. and Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
