Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Sisneroz et al v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2008cv01358
Plaintiff:
Frank Enepi Sisneroz, George Vasquez, Frank Romas Sumahit and others
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Angulo v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Michael Angulo
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumahit v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Sumahit
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Languein v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael Languein
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisneroz et al v. Ahlin et al
as 2:2008cv01697
Plaintiff:
Frank Enepi Sisneroz, George Vasquez, Frank Romas Sumahit and others
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chavez v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chavez
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmony v. California Department of Mental Health et al
as 1:2007cv01558
Plaintiff:
Harold E Carmony
Defendant:
Steven Mayberg, W. T. Voss, Ben McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00985
Plaintiff:
Fred Scott
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00913
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mayberg et al
as 1:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Scott
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Ben McClain, Gary Renzaglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.