Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Tamir Abdullah v. State of California et al.
as 5:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Tamir Abdullah
Defendant:
State of California, Michael Ramos, Eddy Lange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Garza v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv01723
Petitioner:
Angel M. Garza
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Bryan Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Earl Kenebrew Jr. v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06047
Plaintiff:
Ronald Earl Kenebrew, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Sgt. Flores and Sgt. Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Josue Ruperto Garza v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Josue Ruperto Garza
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Torres v. Quick et al
as 1:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Edward Torres
Defendant:
Jayson Quick, Manuel Perez Garza, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
A. Arisco, E. Garza, R. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) O'Brien v. Garza et al
as 2:2022cv01730
Defendant:
Portee, R. Garza and Baker
Plaintiff:
Kory T. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
