Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sorenson v. De La Garza et al
as 4:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Kelton Johnathon Sorenson
Defendant:
Cynthia Cruz, Bita Yager and Melisa De La Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Cook
as 2:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Thomas Garza
Defendant:
Rollin Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agarwal et al v. Heart and Soul Adoptions et al
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Suneet Krishna Agarwal and Martha Walker Agarwal
Defendant:
Heart and Soul Adoptions , Denise Garza and Rachel Patten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Turley et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Thomas Garza
Defendant:
Steven Turley, Robert Miller, Randall Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv01079
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Garza
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza-Morales v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00090
Petitioner:
Walter Osbaldo Garza-Morales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Garza Y Galindo et al v. Asset Recovery Trust et al
as 2:2007cv00868
Plaintiff:
Luis Garza Y Galindo, Rafael Benita Garza and Global Consultant Services
Defendant:
Asset Recovery Trust, Danny M.K. Wong, David Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garza Y Galindo et al v. Asset Recovery Trust et al
as 2:2007cv00349
Plaintiff:
Luis Garza Y Galindo, Rafael Garza and Global Consultant Services
Defendant:
Asset Recovery Trust, Danny M.K. Wong, David Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garza v. Burnett
as 1:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Thomas Garza
Defendant:
Troy Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
