Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Diaz v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Alicia Noemi Bautista Diaz
Defendant:
Gate Gourmet, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Mohammed Rahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Pascal Moore v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05834
Plaintiff:
Pascal Moore
Defendant:
Gate Gourmet, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Todd S. Diener v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05041
Defendant:
LSG Group, Sky Chefs, Inc., LSG Sky Chefs and others
Plaintiff:
Todd S. Diener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Todd S. Diener v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03810
Defendant:
LSG Sky Chefs, Inc., LSG Group, Sky Chefs, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Diener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03273
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Scott et al v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11033
Plaintiff:
Brenda McCoy, Dominique Ferdinand and Charles Scott
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alicia Noemi Bautista Diaz v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv09454
Defendant:
Gate Gourmet, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Alicia Noemi Bautista Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rahman v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03047
Defendant:
gategroup U.S. Holding, Inc. and Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
mohammed rahman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
