Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gaynett Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10721
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, MARK INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Gaynett v. Powell et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Gaynett Powell
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Correctional Institute/Annex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX
as 3:2021cv01009
Petitioner:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Santa Rosa Correctional Institution Annex
as 3:2021cv00880
Plaintiff:
Gaynett Powell
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Correctional Institute/Annex and Santa Rosa Correctional Institution Annex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaynett Powell v. Bermudez, et al
as 20-12650
Defendant / Appellee:
DADE CI WARDEN, of Dade Correctional Institute, BERMUDEZ, of Dade Correctional Institute, BAKER, of Dade Correctional Institute and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAYNETT POWELL
Powell v. Bermudez et al
as 1:2020cv20391
Defendant:
Psychiatrist Media, Psychiatrist Driliani, Regional Director Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Gaynett Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaynett Powell v. Jeremy Harris, et al
as 19-14683
Defendant / Appellee:
G. C. ANDERSON, Officer, JEREMY A. HARRIS, Assistant Warden, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAYNETT POWELL
Gaynett Powell v. Warden, et al
as 18-13307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEEL, Office of the Secretary Department of Corrections and others
POWELL v. BARFIELD
as 5:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
BARFIELD, JULIE JONES, NEEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaynett Powell v. Harris, et al
as 17-11673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRIS, PERKINS, LOGO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
