Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Khan v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv08993
Plaintiff:
Genghis Khan
Defendant:
Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, Capt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv08629
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lee, Daeshawn McCray, Kevin Terry and others
Defendant:
Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, Capt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Capra
as 1:2018cv01967
Petitioner:
Genghis Khan
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stevenson v. Curnel et al
as 1:2017cv00764
Plaintiff:
Genghis Khan Ali Stevenson
Defendant:
M. Curnel, J. Caldwell, Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genghis Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-55119
Petitioner - Appellant:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Genghis Stevenson v. USDC-CASF
as 16-73929
:
In re: GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Petitioner:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Stevenson v. Biter
as 3:2015cv01926
Petitioner:
Genghis Khan Ali Stevenson
Respondent:
Martin Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Genghis Stevenson v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72044
:
In re: GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Petitioner:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Genghis Stevenson v. Gregory Blake
as 13-56450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY BLAKE, Caliptria State Prison Locksmith
Genghis Stevenson v. Derral Adams, et al
as 12-17665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENGHIS KHAN ALI STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, S. ROUSSEAU, GIBSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
