Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Anjali Ward v. Judith Lawrence, et al
as 23-15790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANJALI WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDITH LAWRENCE, CHAU NGUYEN, MARK ROBISON and others
Pamela Pringle v. Amanda Gentry, et al
as 18-16038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA GENTRY, SHANNON CLUNEY, NOEL BARLOW-HUST and others
Daniella Slater, et al v. Shannon Deasey, et al
as 17-56751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIELLA SLATER, DAMIEN SLATER, individually and as successors in interest, by and through their Guardian ad Litem Sandra Salazar, TINA SLATER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SHANNON DEASEY, Deputy; previously erroneously named as Shandon Deasey, PETER GENTRY, Deputy, GARY BRANDT, Deputy and others
Daniella Slater, et al v. Shannon Deasey, et al
as 17-56708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLA SLATER, DAMIEN SLATER, individually and as successors in interest, by and through their Guardian ad Litem Sandra Salazar, TINA SLATER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANNON DEASEY, Deputy; previously erroneously named as Shandon Deasey, PETER GENTRY, Deputy, GARY BRANDT, Deputy and others
Roosevelt Williams, Jr. v. The State of California, et al
as 16-56396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, it's employees, agents, supervisors and workers, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, (DCFS), a public entity, its employees, agents, supervisors and workers and others
Howard Hofelich v. Barbara Lacy, et al
as 14-16118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD HOFELICH
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA LACY, CARL VINCENTI, RONALD IBARRA and others
David Rhodes v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 13-15912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. RHODES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, JACK HARRIS, Public Safety Manager, JOE YAHNER, Chief of Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
