Cases
SPINNEY v. PITTSBURG-CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83517
Plaintiff: RICHARD SPINNEY and LILLIAN CALOS
Defendant: PITTSBURG-CORNING CORP. , RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION , A C & S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOBEIL et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv92436
Plaintiff: ROLAND E GOBEIL and JEANNE GOBEIL
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MUSSELMAN et al v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91457
Plaintiff: CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN, CHARLES MUSSELMAN and others
Defendant: AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARVINMERITOR, INC., ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
FALLOWFIELD v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91458
Plaintiff: E. JOANNE FALLOWFIELD
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
TALBOT et al v. ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70499
Plaintiff: FREDERICK TALBOT and SHIRLEY JOYCE TALBOT
Defendant: ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC., GENUINE PARTS CO., INC., NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Gobeil et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv10382
Plaintiff: Roland E Gobeil and Jeanne Gobeil
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury Both
SWARTZ v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64384
Plaintiff: IRENE E. SWARTZ
Defendant: A C & S, INC., AMCEHM PRODUCTS, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?