Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WALLS v. GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00171
Defendant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WESLEY WALLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03165
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Southeastern Automotive, Inc. v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 1:2016cv02442
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company and John Michael Riess, II
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Genuine Parts Company v. Southeastern Automotive, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00955
Plaintiff:
Genuine Parts Company
Defendant:
Southeastern Automotive, Inc., Charles J. Harrell, Brandon W. Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haskings v. Genuine Parts Company
as 1:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
Ashley Haskings
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Discover Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. AIM Leasing Company et al
as 1:2014cv03039
Plaintiff:
Discover Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
AIM Leasing Company and Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Myers et al v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, 3M Company, Dexter Hysol Aerospace, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Myers and Sherry Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Wells v. Genuine Parts Company
as 1:2013cv02421
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wells
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Genuine Parts Company v. Delta Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02437
Plaintiff:
Genuine Parts Company
Defendant:
Delta Automotive Group, Inc. and Leslie Sturgill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
