Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv03510
Defendant:
MISCHO, HALL, TARRA C. MUNNINGLY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02417
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LARRY VOLZ, DC PUBLIC LIBRARY POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00106
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY
PAYNE v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
ERIC PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02265
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RENNER, DIANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
THOMAS K. JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DIANE MAY, DAVID RENAER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK-BEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Petitioner:
AMUN RA CLARK-BEY
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, BEN C. CLYBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK-BEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND, et al.,
as 1:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
AMUN RA CLARK-BEY
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MARTIN O'MALLEY, DOUG GANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EL v. WOOD et al
as 1:2012cv01778
Plaintiff:
WISDOM ISSA EL
Defendant:
C. WOOD, ERIK H. NYCE, SADLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING GEORGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv02164
Plaintiff:
KING GEORGE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
