Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kidwell v Wagoner et al.
as 2:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Billy R. Kidwell
Defendant:
G. Richard Wagoner, Percy N. Barmevik, Erskine B. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Richard J. Bowser, et al v. General Motors Corporation, et al
as 08-1847
:
IN RE: GENERAL MOTORS ERISA LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL PYRKA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AL BALNIUS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JERRY L. CANTER and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
JERRY D. FOWLE and WILLIAM LAPRAD
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD J. BOWSER and RICHARD IRWIN, III
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, RICHARD WAGONER, JR., E. STANLEY O'NEAL and others
ZEMPRELLI v. TAUREL et al
as 1:2008cv00854
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZEMPRELLI and EDWARD ZEMPRELLI
Defendant:
SIDNEY TAUREL, JOHN C. LECHLEITER, SIMON N.R. HARFORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System v. Taurel et al
as 1:2008cv01554
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor General Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Sidney Taurel, John C. Lechleiter, Sir Winfried Bischoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robbins v. Taurel et al
as 1:2008cv01471
Plaintiff:
Laurie G. Robbins
Defendant:
Sidney Taurel, Alan Breier, Charles Lechleiter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waldman v. Taurel et al
as 1:2008cv00560
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Waldman
Defendant:
Sidney Taurel, Alan Breier, John Lechleiter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
General Motors Corporation Securities and Derivative Litigation
as 2:2006md01749
Plaintiff:
Deka Investment GmbH, Deka Investment GmbH, Deka Investment GmbH and others
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation and others
Movant:
Institutional Investor Group
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
