Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bailey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv01002
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bailey
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Harris v. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv06001
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Georgia-Pacific Wood Products, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Woods v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
Shannon Woods
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC, Georgia-Pacific Bleach Board Hopper Paper Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amerson, et al v. Georgia-Pacific LLC, et al
as 1:2015cv01020
Plaintiff:
Sherry Amerson and Richard Amerson
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Georgia-Pacific Corporation and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Georgia Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Shannon Woods
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Georgia Pacific, LLC v. Vescom Corporation
as 1:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
Georgia Pacific, LLC
Defendant:
Vescom Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Greene et al v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01087
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene and Cindy Greene
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC , Edward Rockette and Ed Rockette Logging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carpenter v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC
as 1:2011cv01004
Plaintiff:
Sativa Carpenter
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
