Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benjamin Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benjamin Woodhouse, Mr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
WOODHOUSE v. META PLATFORMS INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS INC., ALPHABET INC., NIKE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Defendant:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Miguel Garcia v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 23-5057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Bill Clinton, Beth Gibson, In Individual Capacity and others
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v BIDEN et al.
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
