Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sanchez v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dyana Sanchez and Gibson Mariano
Defendant:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Turner et al v. Gibson et al
as 1:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr. and Maurice Haskell
Defendant:
Connie Gibson and Terressa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Alvarado, et al v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, et al.
as 1:2021cv00268
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Max N. Otani, Nolan Espinda and others
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Hata, Francisco Alvarado, Robert Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nash v. Ige
as 1:2020cv00398
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Hata, Robert Gibson, Lana Heick and others
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Josh Green, David Y. Ige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. USA
as 1:2019cv00420
Petitioner:
June Gibson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00183
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
PRM KAUAI, LLC v. GIBSON
as 1:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
PRM Kauai, LLC
Defendant:
James Gibson and Bancentre Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Gibson , Timothy E. Johns and B. G. Moynahan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
