Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lamar (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2026cv04757
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mark Lamar
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Gilbert Caley and Adrienne Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leyba (PS) v. Caley et al
as 1:2026cv03776
Plaintiff:
Furmen Leyba
Defendant:
Gilbert Caley, Quillin, Rynek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsell v. Caley et al
as 1:2026cv03606
Petitioner:
Jamale Townsell
Respondent:
Phil Weiser, Gilbert Caley and Moses Andre Stancil
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lucero (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv02820
Plaintiff:
Fred Raynel Lucero
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Moses Stancil, Randolph Maul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayed v. Caley, et al
as 26-1175
Petitioner:
HAZHAR A. SAYED
Respondent:
GILBERT CALEY, Warden, Limon Correctional Facility, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Sayed (PS) v. Caley
as 1:2026cv01597
Petitioner:
Hazhar A. Sayed
Respondent:
Gilbert Caley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Stancil et al
as 1:2026cv01509
Plaintiff:
Darryl B. Rose
Defendant:
Gilbert Caley, Moses Andre Stancil, Kevin Richie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayed (PS) v. Caley et al
as 1:2026cv01357
Petitioner:
Hazhar A. Sayed
Respondent:
Gilbert Caley, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kallungi (PS) v. Caley et al
as 1:2026cv00776
Plaintiff:
Dane Kallungi
Defendant:
Shannon Friesen and Gilbert Caley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
