Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
MORINVILLE et al v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01779
Plaintiff: GILBERT P. HYATT and Paul Morinville
Defendant: United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Hyatt v. PTO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2324
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREI IANCU, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Hyatt v. PTO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1708
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff / Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
HYATT v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02800
Plaintiff: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
In re: Gilbert Hyatt
as 22-5054
In Re: In re: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 18-2390
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1039
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1070
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1038
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Gilbert Hyatt v. Vidal
as 19-1049
Cross Appellant: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?