Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Gillings v. Banvelos et al
as 1:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Nigel Gillings
Defendant:
Banvelos, Yagar, H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv - Fed. Question - Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00901
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lawrence v. Blackman et al
as 1:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Defendant:
Amy (I) Blackman, Amy Blackman, David (I) Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. ADP TotalSource, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gill
Defendant:
ADP TotalSource, Inc. and Kessler Enterprise, Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gill et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv01664
Plaintiff:
Amardeep Gill and Teresa Gill
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Greenway Nutrients, Inc. v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
Greenway Nutrients, Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Blackburn , Stacy Blackburn , David Selakovic and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gilles v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
John A. Gilles
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Suggs v. Adams, et al.,
as 1:2012cv02842
Plaintiff:
Richard Suggs
Defendant:
Jonathan Adams, Kenneth McKim, Erick Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillings v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2012cv01725
Plaintiff:
Chester O. Gillings
Defendant:
Larry C. Schwartz and Diane Cuneo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
