Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Karnes et al v. Montengo et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Shawna Karnes and Jeff Glaser
Defendant:
Tiffany Montengo and CPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
West-Bowlson v. Randall S. Miller and Associates, P.C. et al
as 2:2014cv13683
Plaintiff:
Rosemary West-Bowlson
Defendant:
Randall S. Miller and Associates, P.C., Randall S. Miller, William Trudgeon and others
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, The et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2012cv11995
Defendant:
Richard Snyder and Andrew Dillon
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit , Susan Glaser , Alvin Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, The et al v. Snyder et al
as 1:2012cv00330
Defendant:
Richard D. Snyder and Andrew Dillon
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, The , Susan Glaser , Alvin Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Police and Fire Retirement Sytem of the City of Detroit et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2011cv11686
Defendant:
RICHARD D SNYDER and Andrew J. Dillon
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement Sytem of the City of Detroit , General Retirement System of the City of Detroit , Susan Glaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelly Services, Incorporated v. Glaser
as 2:2010cv11709
Plaintiff:
Kelly Services, Incorporated
Defendant:
Amy Hunter Glaser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv10564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Budnick et al v. Glaser
as 2:2008cv15058
Plaintiff:
Gerald Budnick and Mary Ann Budnick
Defendant:
Karen Glaser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dembinski et al v. Kerr Corporation
as 2:2008cv10355
Plaintiff:
Edward Dembinski, Edward Dembinski, Charles Glaser and others
Defendant:
Kerr Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
