Cases 1 - 4 of 4
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees; Chris Christophersen and John Maggiore, Trustees; et al v. Cline Glass Contractors, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05278
Plaintiff:
District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees , Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund; and its Joint Board of Trustees , Northern California Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Trust Fund; and its Joint Boards of Trustees and others
Defendant:
Cline Glass Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Southern California, Arizona, Colorado, and Southern Nevada Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glassworkers Pension Plan v. Dryden Glass Contractors, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00618
Defendant:
Dryden Glass Contractors, Inc. and E&R Glass Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Southern California, Arizona, Colorado, and Southern Nevada Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glassworkers Pension Plan
Shuff et al v. HDS & Partners at DTW, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv11716
Plaintiff:
Frank Shuff and Pierson Halleck
Defendant:
HDS & Partners at DTW, LLC , Glass and Mirror Craft, LLC, The Petersen Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sun Construction Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03632
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Sun Construction Group, Inc., Safeco Insurance Company of America , A&D Welding and others
Cross_claimant:
Glass Contractors, Inc. , Cordale, Inc. , Atlanta Energy Specialists, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America, Sun Construction Group, Inc., Thomas Concrete of Georgia, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Glass Contractors, Inc. , Cordale, Inc. and Atlanta Energy Specialists, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
