Cases 1 - 5 of 5
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06627
Plaintiff:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC , APTALIS PHARMA US, INC. , APTALIS PHARMATECH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, LP et al
as 2:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ALCHEMY ASSET SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, LP and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SMITHKLINE BEECH PLC v. APOTEX CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2001cv02169
Plaintiff:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, P.L.C.
Defendant:
APOTEX CORPORATION , APOTEX, INC. and TORPHARM, INC.
Movant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Counter_claimant:
APOTEX CORPORATION , APOTEX, INC. and TORPHARM, INC.
Counter_defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , PENTECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , GLAXOSMITHKLINE p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, et al v. APOTEX CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2001cv00159
Plaintiff:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, P.L.C. and BEECHAM GROUP, p.l.c.
Defendant:
APOTEX CORPORATION , APOTEX, INC. and TORPHARM, INC.
Movant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Counter_defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , SMITHKLINE BEECHAM, p.l.c. , GLAXOSMITHKLINE p.l.c. and others
Counter_claimant:
APOTEX CORPORATION , APOTEX, INC. and TORPHARM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM C v. APOTEX CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2000cv04888
Plaintiff:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Defendant:
APOTEX CORPORATION , APOTEX, INC. and TORPHARM, INC.
Movant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Counter_claimant:
APOTEX CORPORATION, APOTEX, INC. and TORPHARM, INC.
Counter_defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PENTECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
