Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Copley et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv05893
Plaintiff:
Lori Copley and Angela Copley
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Robin Rhodes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 2:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mitchell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfost v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pfost
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00772
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Gibson
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00774
Plaintiff:
James Prince
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2011cv00754
Plaintiff:
Paul Meade
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00752
Plaintiff:
Marsha Chapman
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sikes v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, et al
as 1:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
Hollis Sikes and Mary Sikes
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Brown
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
