Real Property Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Glenn v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: Earl Glenn
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glenn v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff: Earl Glenn
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00029
Defendant: Elnora L Deer, Sally Arlene Mann, Barbara Judkins and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant: Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Defendant: Christian Bartholomew Switch, Herbert Joe White, Nancy Gay White Mann and others
Plaintiff: City of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
James et al v. Berexco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00646
Plaintiff: Jeremy Ring, Elizabeth Tilson-Parrish, Brenda Duverney-Chappell and others
Defendant: Mid-Con Energy Operating LLC, Does 1-25, Territory Resources LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Mathews et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv04106
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Debra Mathews, Jacob Almon Robinson, Raymon Glenn Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Blocker et al v. ConocoPhillips Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00248
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company
Plaintiff: James Blocker , Jamie Blocker , Corey B Bolding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3278
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN, AND RE TRACT NO. 1062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 2062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less, located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 3062710, containing 160.00 acres more or less, located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein other PL/EL/TL-3062710 and others
Defendant - Appellant: NASH OIL AND GAS DEFENDANTS, PRATT WELL SERVICE DEFENDANTS, VAL ENERGY DEFENDANTS and others
Defendant Counterclaimant: JANDIE OIL CO., INC., IVAN W. MILTON, LISA M. MILTON and others
Defendant: STULL & BEVERLIN, LLC
:
Northern Natural Gas v. Approximately 9117 Acres, et al
as 15-3286
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant: TRACT NO. 1012711, containing 159.88 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein other PL/EL/TL-1012711, TRACT NO. 1032711, containing 139.04 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein, TRACT NO. 1042711, containing 159.40 acres more or less, located in Pratt County, Kansas, and as further described herein and others
Defendant Counterclaimant: PAUL J. BEAVER, L.D. DAVIS, CARL DUDREY and others
Defendant: KENNETH GLENN, STULL & BEVERLIN, LLC, APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, KINGMAN, AND RE TRACT NO. 1062710, containing 80.00 acres more or less located in Kingman County, Kansas, and as further described herein and others
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?